跳到主要內容

沙漠農業與林業

沙漠農業與林業

In order to improve food security, arid regions should establish desert agriculture and desert agroforestry as their mainstream agricultural technique.  Such regions include Africa, the Middle East, and Australia. 
Desert agriculture is the farming of crops well-suited for arid conditions, such as sorghum.  Desert agroforestry is the growing of crops with the environmental support of trees in desert or arid areas. 
By incorporating these two agricultural techniques,countries should expect two results.  One is the increase in food in desert regions due to the successful growth of specific crops that are well-suited to the dry and hot environment.  Other crops would require many more resources and much more maintenance in order to just survive in such a climate.  The other is the prevention of desertification, which is defined by “Desertification” (2006) as the destruction of animal and plant life in arid areas due to human actions, by the active revegetation of arid lands.

Region-specific Agriculture
According to Markwei, Ndlovu, Robinson, and Shah (2010), “A broader perspective [to reducing hunger in Africa] encompasses an integrated agricultural commodity value chain from production through to processing and marketing with a local and regional perspective.  It accounts for the multiple functions of agriculture that include the improvement of livelihoods, the enhancement of environmental services, the conservation of natural resources and biodiversity, and the contribution of agriculture to the maintenance of social and cultural traditions” (p. 7).
The proposed solution goes hand in hand with this quote.
A comparison of corn grown with fertilizer (right) and corn grown without it (left) in Malawi.  The fertilizer requires annual reapplication, and is still pricey for farmers despite subsidization.  Source:  Duffell, 2007

Currently, several countries of arid climates support the growth of maize despite its need for water and irrigation.  But as realized in Kenya, the increasingly arid land is unable to support maize crops (Mbogo, 2010).  This proves that while maize is an internationally important grain, and is successfully grown in many areas, it is not the most suitable crop for Africa.  By growing crops suitable for arid climates, not only will more water be available for other purposes, but less intensive and more sustainable and organic farming will be possible.  Specific species, particularly those suitable for Africa, for not only agriculture but also agroforestry are described a bit later in the page.
Also, growing plants and crops in desert areas will help prevent desertification, which is a problem many countries are facing.  According to “Desertification” (2006), one way to prevent desertification is by preventing soil erosion, which planting vegetation will do.  Moreover, since plants native to arid climates will be planted, the plants will be low maintenance and will thrive, as proven by their natural existence in the climates today.  (Mnzava, 1985)

Case Study:  Africa
The following is a list of plant species that can play a vital role in the proposed solution for Africa, and other arid regions after taking cultural and environmental factors, as explained later, into account.  Several are particularly attractive because of their ability to fix nitrogen, which is the process of putting nitrogen, a valuable element for plant growth, back into the soil.  Putting nitrogen and other nutrients back into the soil provides food for growing vegetation, and can potentially reverse desertification by reviving the soil (“Desertification,” 2006).
Dregne (1976) lists several plants that live in but are not limited to the arid regions if Africa (p.56).  The list includes:
  • Acacia
Figure 1.  Distribution of acacia in terms of maps.  Source:  Australian National Botanic Gardens [ANBC], 2010 
(Left) Figure 2.  Distribution of Acacia dealbata in Europe (as an alien species)  Source:  Marchante, 2006
(Right) Figure 3.  Distribution of acacia aneura in Australia.  Source:  Nix & Austin, 1973

In addition to having medicinal uses, wood suitable for construction material and fuel, and edible products for humans and animals, widespread (as seen by the above figures) acacia trees provide environmental benefits too (World Agricultural Centre [ICRAF], 2009).  It serves as a wind breaker and prevents soil erosion; but most importantly it is a great source of nitrogen (ICRAF, 2009).
In a study with Acacia dealbata, the trees, planted at 2500 stems per hectare (stems/ha) were able to generate about 50 kilograms of nitrogen per hectare (kg/ha)—40 kg/ha was in the soil, and 10kg/ha was in its vegetation in one year (May & Atwill, 2003).  A part of the study was performed in a region that was slashed and burned, so nitrogen fixation was greater there because of the nutrient-rich ash (May & Atwill, 2003).  However, it is not advisable to perform such agricultural techniques because it was calculated for the acacia trees to take 9 years to replenish the nitrogen that was lost (May & Atwill).  What makes several, if not most species of acacia trees particularly interesting is “reverse leaf phenology” (Heimbuch, 2009).  Reverse leaf phenology makes the tree shed its nitrogen-rich acacia leaves at the start of the rainy season, which creates high quality, nutrient-filled soil (Heimbuch, 2009).  As recorded by Boffa, reverse leaf phenology and nitrogen fixation of Faidherbia albida (F.albida) acacia trees yield about a 30% to 150% increase in nitrogen content depending on the environment (Boffa, 1999).  

Table 1.  Improvement (%) of soil nutrient content under Faidherbia albida canopies compared to controls
SourceCarbonTotal NAvg PExch. KCaMgNa
Charreau & Vidal6294134431007833
Dancette & Poulain373332 43  
Jung 1966100100     
Jung 1969 156574527053 
Olivier et al 199611-8615-10718-3670-1152-470-33 
Seyler 199338 (organic matter)60601132836 
Source:  Boffa, 1999, Biophysical Factors in Parkland Management:  Parkland tree species

Planting crops alongside the trees is also attractive because the leaves fall at the same time as when farmers plant seeds, which is at the beginning of the rainy season, and nitrogen and other nutrients are released when the growing crops need them most (Hines & Eckman).  The crops and trees also do not compete for sunlight because the trees have shed their leaves, and F. albida trees also provide little competition for water resources, even when planted at 4 by 4 meters away from each other (Boffa, 1999).  According to Roupsard, Ferhi, Granier, Pallo, Depommier, Mallet, Joly, and Dreyer (1999), the trees only use less than 5% of annual rainfall.  In Malawi, growing maize alongside these trees increased yields by 280% (Heimbuch, 2009).  The corn and trees do not compete for sunlight because the corn grows when the leaves of the acacia tree are gone, and the leaves fall coincidentally at the same time as when farmers plant their seeds (Heimbuch, 2009).  Yields for other crops grown with F. albida trees are shown on this table (Boffa, 1999).
 
Table 2.  Crop yields under and outside Faidherbia albida canopies
Crop
grain yield (kg/ha)
biomass yield (kg/ha)Source
 outsideunderdifference (%)outsideunderdifference (%) 
Millet6601669153   Charreau & Vidal (1965)
Millet645104462   Louppe et al (1996)
Millet1008150649   Maiga, in Kessler (1992)
Sorghum457934104548010490100Dancette & Poulain (1969)
Sorghum, fertilizer134013883158701814014Dancette & Poulain (1969)
Sorghum1570213036   Poschen (1986)
Sorghum1975291691538260770Depommier et al (1992)
Sorghum8899375   Maiga, in Kessler (1992)
Maize (local)  42-272   Saka et al. (1994)
Maize (hybrid)  76-78   Saka et al. (1994)
Maize192033907653 g/pl.66 g/pl.24Poschen (1986)
Maize  27  22Depommier et al (1996a)
Groundnut11811052-11990138240Louppe et al (1996)
Groundnut, manure1289992-2314921459-2Louppe et al (1996)
Groundnut 810110837860126647Dancette & Poulain (1966), in CTFT (1988)
Groundnut, fertilizer9541136191091138627Dancette & Poulain (1996), in CTFT (1988)
Source:  Boffa, 1999, Biophysical Factors in Parkland Management:  Influence of trees on mineral content of understoery plants

Note that key to reverse leaf phenology is letting the acacia trees grow naturally, which includes not pruning them (Boffa, 1999).  
As cited by Heimbuch (2009), Dennis Garrity, Director General of the World Agroforestry Centre, says, “Growing the right tree in the right place on farms in sub-Saharan Africa-and worldwide- has the potential to slow climate change, feed more people, and protect the environment. This tree, as a source of free, organic nitrogen, is an example of that. There are many other examples of solutions to African farming that exist here already.”
While most scientists are attracted to F. albida in sub-Saharan Africa, the same idea is applicable in many other areas with other types of acacia.  For example, one study, performed in Blue Nile Sudan, showed that Acacia senegal under different climates perform similarly in terms of nitrogen fixing, and that in turn increases with the age of the tree (Raddad, Salih, Fadl, Kaarakka & Luukkanen, 2005).  And within the research mentioned up to this point, three different species have been evaluated, and all had nitrogen fixing properties.  Boffa (1999) agrees, saying, “Nutrient enrichment under other parkland trees may be less remarkable than for F. albida but is also common” (Parkland Tree Species).

Figure 4.  Map of distribution of Faidherbia albidain Africa.  Source:  Boffa, 1999, Agroforestry Parkland Systems

Such a project to integrate acacias into agriculture already exists.  The Maradi Integrated Development Project (MIDP), having successfully developed sustainable agriculture for twenty years, encourages Niger to use agroforestry (with Australian acacias) as a sustainable farming technique (“Austrailian Acacias,” 2008).
  • Adansonia
While Adansonia, commonly known as baobabs, do not necessarily have nitrogen fixing properties, African natives are able to utilize almost every part of the tree for food or other commodities (Mnzava, 1985).  Most species exist in Madagascar, but the Adansoniadigitata grows throughout Africa, even though it is only indigenous to the southern area, because it was spread by natives (Le Jardin Naturel, n.d.).  Baobabs are able to survive in several areas, particularly arid regions because their massive trunks store a significant amount of water (“Adansonaia,” n.d.).  A. digitata even appears to be a halophyte, since it has been seen growing in salt plains (Oxford, n.d.).

Figure 5.  Distribution of A. digitata.  Varying dot shades are from different sources, documented on the original website.  Notice the dots in Yemen.  Source:  Boffa, 1999, Agroforestry Parkland Systems:  Other important parkland species


  • Balanites
Balaniteaegyptica, native to Africa and Middle East, is another species native to Africa that fixes nitrogen (Hines & Eckman, 1993).  It also has many uses for feed and fuel, and is an edible, but bitter, vegetable (ICRAF, n.d.c).

(Right)  Figure 6.  Distribution of Balanites aegyptiaca.  Source: Boffa, 1999, Agroforestry Parkland Systems:  Other Important Parkland Species

  • Capparis
Several Capparis species, including C. decidua and C. tomentosa, provide a source of fruit and fodder (ICRAF, n.d.b; ICRAF, n.d.c)
  • Sorghum
Sorghum is particularly important for Africa because it is one of the most drought-tolerant grain crops currently being cultivated (U.S. Grain council, 2010).  But, sorghum is also able to grow in temperate or tropical regions, in salty or waterlogged soil (NAS, 1996, p. 127). As one of the most efficient plants photosynthetically, sorghum provides the most calories per unit of mechanical energy spent.   Internationally, sorghum is already is an important grain that is rich in antioxidants and is gluten-free, and is most likely going to become even more important in the coming years (U.S. Grain Council, 2010).  Not only can sorghum be consumed, but it can also be used for forage, construction materials, agricultural purposes, and commercial products (NAS, 1996, p. 128).
  • Eragrostis
Eragrostis tefis a high quality, drought resistant grain, grown mostly in Ethiopia despite being suitable for many other arid regions and being able to grow under yearly variable conditions (National Academy of Sciences [NAS], 1996, p.218).  As shown by Ethiopia’s 0.9 million tons of grain grown, or a fourth of the country’s cereal production, the crop is quite successful (NAS, 1996, p.215)   However, growing E. tef requires hard labor; agricultural techniques are not well developed and thus far requires complicated cultural practices (NAS, 1996, p. 218).
Many other species of trees and plants might not provide food, but can be valuable in other respects, such as for medicinal purposes, fodder, and materials that can be used to make other commercial commodities.

This list of particular species that can be used in desert agriculture or desert agroforestry does not only pertain to Africa.  For example, Australia and Africa have very similar climates and share similar vegetation--Australia has its own native acacias and baobab, and as mentioned above, some of Australia’s acacias are being used to help Africa (“Austrailian Acacis,” 2008; 20).  Astrebla, a drought tolerant grass and important source of feed during dry seasons, is another example, as it is native to Australia, but also suitable for Africa’s climate (Cook et al, 2005).
This map shows where Astrebla spp. can be grown in Africa
Figure 7.  This map shows where Astrebla spp. is suitable in Africa.  Source:  Cook et al, 2005

Implementation
Implementation will come from two directions.  One direction starts with convincing participating governments that using region-specific crops for agriculture and incorporating agroforestry will be economically advantageous for the largest number of people.  The key is that the plants grown will be agriculturally important and feed people, unlike the plants foresters in Senegal introduced, like the non-native eucalyptus and pine trees, which can only be used as firewood and support no other life (Mnzava, 1985).  Eucalyptus trees in particular grow extremely fast, making it advantageous for foresters to grow, but they provide nothing for people other than foresters and their livestock (Mnzava, 1985).  To counter situations like this, education of and agreements by the governments and their people, in addition to economic motivation and political coercion, is required in order for regions to implement changes to their agriculture.
The government in turn should provide seeds for the native plants, and make it economically advantageous to use native plants as crops. 
Farmers who need to change crops will also have to be convinced that the new crops will be profitable due to the fact that they can handle arid conditions better.  They will have to phase out their old crops and begin planting the new ones, eventually to produce as much or more than what they originally were.  Researchers, teachers, and farmers will need to work together in order to develop and implement the most optimal sustainable methods of growing crops.
The other direction starts at the villages rather than through the government.  Often times, more rural communities better understand their own needs and their region’s ecosystem because they rely heavily on it.  For example, in Senegal, farmers do not cut down baobab trees because they understand its importance in their lives (Mnzava, 1985).  They also appreciate nitrogen fixing trees, despite not knowing anything about nitrogen fixation (Mnzava, 1985).  By directly giving villagers seeds for their native trees, reforestation would be much more successful, and the villagers would have more sources of food. 
According to the International Development Research Centre (IDRC) (1998), a workshop on agroforestry was held at Kenya in 1995 to try to come up with a collaborative model for it.  Farmers suggested that the beginnings of agroforestry start as several group nurseries, which could communicate with each other for help, support, and education (IDRC, 1998).  The farmers knew that they would need more training and education in order to run the nurseries (IDRC, 1998).  Everyone who attended the workshop agreed that there needed to be an “agroforestry forum” that would promote agroforestry techniques, an “agroforestry resource center” to support agroforestry development efforts, which would include native farmer groups, and a tree-seed bank in each district to facilitate agroforestry development (IDRC, 1998).
As a branch off of what the farmers suggested, a “local technology group” will also be developed.  The purpose of this group is for farmers and local researchers to develop and provide simple, efficient technologies and techniques that would improve farming efficiencies and production (Gurnitz, 2010).  Such techniques could be the optimal spacing of trees that should be used derived by researchers, or the planting of trees in pits to help revive degraded soils as discovered by farmers (Farm Radio International, 2003).  The local technology group will disseminate the helpful information and considerably improve crop production.

Figure 8.  Diagram of suggested organization of groups to implement desert agroforestry and agriculture in villages, adapted from the ideas resulting from the workshop in Kenya in 1998.

There also currently are several projects between banks and non-profit organizations to support farmers.  One project, supported by Africa Harvest and Equity Bank, will help 10,000 Kenyan farmers switch from growing corn to growing sorghum (Mbogo, 2010).  Equity Bank offers low interest loans for farmers to buy seed and other farming necessities, and Africa Harvest ensures quality yields by offering technical support (Mbogo, 2010).  Other projects, like the Coca Cola Project, are investing in 50,000 Kenyan and Ugandan small farmers for their crop yields (Mbogo, 2010). 
Similar programs focusing more on the spread of desert agroforestry and desert agriculture will help implement the solution to feed people in arid countries.

The Limits of Region-Specific Agriculture and Agroforestry
This plan primarily targets regions that suffer from extremely arid, arid, or semi-arid conditions.  These regions would be defined by the Thornthwaite moisture index that depends not only on precipitation, but other conditions such as topographical distance from a water source (Dregne, 1976, p.5, 7).  

Figure 8.  A map of arid regions in the world.  Source:  modified from Meigs, 1953, by  Dregne, 1976, p.6

However, the planting of these species should not infringe on other ecosystems that exist with minimal human interaction.  For example, savannahs should remain savannahs and support their ecosystems.  Where people already are farming, and where civilizations already exist, are suitable places for planting more trees. 
This plan of implementing agroforestry and more suitable crops for agriculture can also be extended to any place undergoing desertification or soil degradation.  However, only certain species should be planted, depending on the region they are being planted in.  Most native plants are suitable, while the effects of introduced species need to be analyzed beforehand, or evaluated in a small area where it will not do too much damage.  The plants grown should not be high maintenance or require many resources.  Instead, they should provide nutrients for the soil, particularly nitrogen, and provide food.  At best, they would support biodiversity, fix nitrogen, and provide food.

Economics and Funding
Governments will have an incentive to fund new agriculture and agroforestry since it will increase agricultural production and reduce hunger.  The international market for several African crops, like tef, is increasing, too (NAS, 1996, p.217).  Aid will come from charities, volunteer groups, and concerned organizations (for instance, the Rockefeller Foundation). 
Some organizations we would work with include the aforementioned Rockefeller Foundation, the US Agency for International Development, Winrock International, and the Partnership to Cut Hunger and Poverty in Africa are possible organizations who will help implement this plan.  Implementing agroforestry, especially with acacia trees, is supported by the World Agroforestry Center (Heimbuch, 2009).  Many other organizations and smaller volunteer groups would be willing to work with the implementation of the plan by helping plant trees or other vegetation, since the work would be a direct help to the environment with tangible results.
Overall, the implementation of this project should not be unreasonably expensive, especially if funded by large corporations, as some were in Kenya (Mbogo, 2010).   In models where the government or non-profit organizations provide free distribution of seeds, some cost must be anticipated for providing seeds, providing education of optimal agricultural techniques, and starting groups or foundations dedicated to desert agriculture and agroforestry.  On the bright side, particularly since native plants are being introduced, many seeds should already be available to the people and fairly inexpensive.  Also, many countries already practice seed distribution.  Unfortunately, in some cases, like in Tanzania, according to Mnzava (1985), some villagers are given seeds for trees that are not helpful in producing food for them or their animals.  So, if they were actually given seeds for desert agriculture, the villagers’ situation would have food to eat and to sell.

A eucalyptus forest, which has clearly been planted.  While this particular forest might not have been a result of government seed distribution to the villagers, there is a large amount of seeds being bought and planted.  Also note how it is a barren forest.  Source: Lang, 2004b

In Peshawar, Pakistan, the government gave 1450 farmers a 50kg bag of wheat seeds, a 50kg bag of fertilizer, and a 50kg bag of assorted vegetable seed, funded by the European Union to help them recover from the recent flood that destroyed their crops (“Government distributes,” 2010; “EU Firm,” 2010).  If similar numbers were used for this project, each farmer will receive a bag of roughly 100kg of an assortment of seeds, depending on what they are planning to grow and the mass of each seed.  They will need only minimal amounts of fertilizer, if any, because the plants they should be growing are well suited to the current soil and climate.  We can project that a 100kg bag of seeds will cost about $100 per farmer.  The cost of one kilogram of acacia seeds is 40 US cents (“Australian Acacias,” 2003).  Moreover, acacia seeds are easy to harvest, nutritious (“Australian Acacias”, 2003).  One report states that the seeds are produced at about 10kg per tree (Harwood, Rinaudo, & Adewusi, 1999).
However, scientific research to better understand the impact of a species in a region, and scientific research in the proposed agricultural technology groups to develop and implement better agricultural techniques will require monetary funding.

Timescale
Developing agroforestry and agriculture will take about 1 to 5 years to start for each region, but will develop infinitely.  The implementation time depends on the education of the farmers and government, the development of groups to promote, develop, and help out with desert agriculture and agroforestry, and the amount of time it will take to phase out old crops and grow trees.  After implementation, research will continue to evaluate which plant species should be used in each region’s agroforestry and agriculture and develop more efficient and sustainable agricultural techniques.  Long term effects, including a better environment overall, most certainly will appear.

Unresolved Issues
While analyzing the traits of certain plants is relatively straight forward, deciding which vegetation should be used to implement desert agriculture and agroforestry and which vegetation should not be is much more difficult.  
Some native plants might be more harmful than beneficial to an ecosystem.  For example, tamarix trees of North Africa seem detrimental to the environment, since they are salty, water draining trees.  However, tamarix are native African trees but only do not compete for water resources with acacia trees because they are distributed so far away from each other (Sher, Wiegand, Ward).  In the Americas, tamarix are known weeds that can thrive in a wide range of areas and drain a lot of water (“Non-native”, n.d.).  A decision about invasive, though perhaps native plant species needs to be made.  A one by one analysis on each species is needed, because, despite being generalized under the same category, each species is different.
Whether or not to introduce non-native crops is also under debate.  As mentioned above, several grains easily found in Africa could be introduced to the Middle East or Australia, or vice versa.  But the effects the introduced grains will have on the ecosystems there are unknown.  One seemingly positive example is given by “Australian acacias” (2008), where Australian acacias are incorporated into Kenyan crops. 
However, an example of a debatably negative exotic crop in Africa is the introduced eucalyptus tree.  Current research shows that eucalyptus trees, commonly known as “water guzzler,” use up a lot of water when planted near water beds, and can severely drain the water table (Okella, 2009; Lang, 2004).  In terms of biodiversity, eucalyptus trees support none (Okella, 2009).  In the past, when non-native trees overtook the indigenous specious, several crops failed because of the lowered water resources, and ruined food security (Lang, 2004). 
From another perspective, eucalyptus trees grow quickly, so they are a good source of wood for foresters, and are extremely helpful in sequestering carbon dioxide (Holman, 2006).  Moreover, only one hectare of trees is planted for every ten cut down, so planting fast-growing trees tackles this issue (Okella, 2009).  Also, according to Dregne (1976), eucalyptus trees are able to grow on the edges of the Sahara desert (p. 56).  In this case, eucalyptus trees do not seem to be water guzzlers, and can be helpful with controlling desertification.

(Right) In the background, there are mesquite bushes growing in the sand dunes, which shows that they could probably survive in the Sahara desert's climate too.  However, the environmental impact of introducing mesquite must be evaluated first.  Source:  Vijayarajan, 2008

So, as suggested by several supporters of eucalyptus trees, exotic species, even edible desert plants like mesquite, should also be investigated one by one (Okella, 2009).  Those that do not devour water sources might be helpful in preventing further desertification, if implemented and planted along the regions becoming uninhabitable by every other plant.
It is also important not to forget the culture of the farmers' and their countries.  The seeds and plants provided to the farmers need to match up with the people's lifestyles.  If the Masai people survive off their livestock, and need vegetation that would be able to serve as fodder, then they need seeds that will provide them that (Mnzava, 1985).

留言

這個網誌中的熱門文章

蔬菜對溫度日照條件的要求

蔬菜對溫度日照條件的要求
全日照  8個小時日照 瓜類、茄果類、豆類、山藥、豆薯(地瓜)。番茄、黃瓜、茄子、辣椒等喜溫中、強光性
蔬菜夏秋季生產,玉米、青椒、西瓜、南瓜、西紅柿、茄子、芝麻、向日葵類。
其次是根莖類,如:馬鈴薯、甜菜、胡蘿蔔、白蘿蔔、甘藷、山藥等等。至少需半日照,才能生長,芋頭雖喜歡全日照,但比其他蔬菜耐蔭。 
需要中等光照大白菜、甘藍、芥菜、蒜、洋蔥。 

長日性蔬菜白菜、甘藍、芥菜、蘿蔔、胡蘿蔔、芹菜、菠菜、萵苣、蠶豆、豌豆、大蔥、洋蔥。

短日性蔬菜豇豆、扁豆、莧菜、空心菜。         

中光性蔬菜黃瓜、番茄、茄子、辣椒、菜豆

菜豆

菜豆喜溫暖,不耐高溫和霜凍。菜豆種子發芽的適溫為20-30℃;在40℃以上的高溫和10℃以下的低溫,種子不易發芽。幼苗生長適宜氣溫為18-25℃。花芽分化的適宜氣溫為20-25℃,過高或過低溫度易出現發育不完全的花蕾、落花。

菜豆對光照強度的要求較高。在適宜溫度條件下,光照充足則植株生長健壯,莖的節間短而分枝多,開花結莢比較多,而且有利於根部對磷肥的吸收。當光照強度減弱時,植株易徒長,莖的節間長,分枝少,葉質薄,而且開花結莢數少,易落花落莢。

菜豆根系強大,能耐一定程度乾旱,但喜中度濕潤土壤條件,要求水分供應適中,不耐澇。生長期適宜土壤濕度為田間最大持水量的60%-70%,空氣相對濕度以80%為宜。開花結莢期對水分最敏感,此期土壤乾旱對開花結莢有不良影響,開花數、結莢數及莢內種子數減少。土壤水分過大時,下部葉片黃化,早脫落。空氣濕度過大會引起徒長、結莢不良。

菜豆具有深根性和根瘤菌,對土壤的要求不甚嚴格,但仍以土層深厚肥沃、排水良好的輕砂壤土或粘質壤土為好。土壤過於粘重、低溫、排水和通氣不良則生長不良,炭疽病重。菜豆喜中性至微酸性土壤,適宜的土壤pH為5-7.0,其中以州6.2-6.8最適宜。菜豆最忌連作,生產中應實行2-3年輪作。

菜豆生育過程中,主要吸收鉀和氮較多,還要吸收一定量的磷和鈣,才能良好發育。結莢期吸收磷鉀量較大。磷鉀肥對菜豆植株的生長發育、根瘤菌的發育、花芽分化、開花結莢和種子的發育等均有影響。缺乏磷肥,菜豆嫩莢和種子的品質和產量就會降低。缺鈣,幼葉葉片捲曲,葉緣失綠和生長點死亡。缺硼,則根係不發達,影響根瘤菌固氮,使花和豆莢發育不良。 耐陰半陰(大概3-4小時日照) 應選擇耐陰的蔬菜種植,如萵…

錦鯉養殖基本知識

◎飼養與管理的重點 只要不是劇烈的變化,錦鯉很容易適應各水溫水質等環境的變化。並不是沒有大庭園就無法飼養,有人甚至在二樓陽台或頂樓陽台造水池飼養。然而我們是欣賞錦鯉雄壯豪邁之氣,因此水池盡量寬闊為宜,以水深1.2m以上為理想。魚池必須有底水排出,過濾循環等設備。用水不一定要取地下水,自來水也可以飼養。
<因為都市中有景觀安全的需求,及屋頂花園有荷重的需求,錦鯉池水深可以低到30cm左右。>
◎每天排水
A、糞或枯死的藻類全部送至過濾槽的話,耗氧量會增大,pH就下降,更會轉變為亞硝酸,增了過濾槽的負擔。為了盡量減輕過濾槽的負擔,每天至少把魚池的底水排水使固物排出去,把中間水送去沉澱槽及過濾槽。 
B、把固體廢物的魚糞集中排出,最好不要從池底打氣而是從排糞口的上方40~50公分打打氣。如此氣泡往上昇。池水產生對流。污物就集中於排糞口。
<可以設計水流把固體廢物盡量集中或排出到過濾系統中。>
◎過濾槽管理
A、細菌附著於濾材,分解固體廢物會消耗大量的氧。 
B、溶氧不足時,厭氧菌會把硝酸還原亞硝酸,或從碳酸氣發生沼氣,也會從硫酸分解產生硫化氫等有毒氣體。
<如果溶氧不足,可以優先把打氣設備放置到生化過濾槽中。>
◎溶氧要充份
A、水中溶氧不足的話,會影響錦鯉的生育,飼料的消化,,水質的維持等等。
B、硝酸,亞硝酸的濃度增高時,會影響溶氧量。所以優先去除硝酸及亞硝酸。
C、使用沸石可輕易去除硝酸,沸石量約等重於魚體總重量。
<沸石再生法,是將沸石浸泡25℃以上1:10食鹽水數小時,再以清水洗淨即可。>
◎水質的控制
水質硬度高的話,錦鯉肌膚經常會有少許充血的狀態。豔麗性也會慢慢消失,紅緋會上升。pH值低,肌膚變的很不好看,但是雖餵增色飼料,依然不見起色,徒增浪費。pH值7.1~7.5最適宜的。
◎鯉餌的重要性
良好的魚餌不會崩壞鯉的體型。餌的量也是在夏天水溫 高的時候,訂定停餌期間,才是整體來說使鯉變胖最重要的秘訣。如果還是想 要給很多餌的話,要增加循還量。錦鯉在水溫超過28度的時候,應給與相當於 鯉全體重量3%的餌。水溫25度時1.5%,水溫20度時0.3%,16度以下則要停止鯉餌,這就是鯉魚長得強壯的要訣。連續不斷地給鯉餌的話,引起內臟障礙, 而影響到鯉不會長壯,甚至導至體型的變歪。
◎魚病預防
水的管理與定期消毒都是很重要的步驟,…

連通管原理與應用

英文版, English version
中文版, Chinese version
西班牙文版, Espanol version 

連通管基本原理 1.連通管原理指的是,在一般開放的空間中,幾個液體容器的底部都相通的裝置,而若任一容器內注入液體,則當液體靜止時,各容器的液面必在同一水平面。



2.兩 端的大氣壓力一樣,但管內兩端的水受重力作用而各自下墜,下墜瞬間,在圓弧頂部拉出一個真空,因真空而有壓力差,此時兩端的大氣壓 力再次從兩端將兩管的水壓回,但壓回的力量是大氣壓力減去管內的水壓(F=(Patm-PH2O)*A),而長管內的水比短管內的水還要重,所以壓回的力 量是短管的壓力大於長管的壓力,所 以,虹吸管內的水就會不斷的由短管端流入而由長管端流出。



3.如果我們用兩根連通管,所以效率會變成兩倍。




4.如果用兩根連通管,但是其中一個連接抽水馬達,此時一根連通管是抽水,所以另一根把水送回,大氣壓力將兩管的水平衡,所 以,一個馬達可以有兩倍的動力,水就會不斷的循環。


問題1:請比較上連通管與下連通管的差異?
問題2:請問雙連通管時,管徑與高度差的關係?



簡易潮汐開關 (外部連通管) 1.由於水持續進入水箱,水在水箱和潮汐開關內以同樣的速度上升。(潮汐開關內的底部是連通的)。虹吸管是通到外部的。水會持續上升到外部的開口端。 2.一旦水上升到內部的開口端,它變成一個密封空間。由於水繼續上升,在水箱內水位繼續上升,但速度變慢。同時,水箱內水壓漸大。
3.由於水位接近高水位線,壓力在開關內鐘將水位上升到臨界,造成部份水會先進入管道。
(同時會將管道上端部份空氣帶出,因為空氣在管內流動,也是噪音最大的時候) 4.由於水在水箱到達高水位線後,體積空氣被迫壓縮管道,並透過虹吸作用,排出的空氣壓力後,進而開始大量排水。
(一旦開始大量排水,也是聲音最小的時候)
5.水會一直流出,直到水位低到讓潮汐開關吸入空氣。然後,潮汐開關回歸起始位置。
6.由於水持續進入水箱,水在水箱和潮汐開關內以同樣的速度上升。(潮汐開關內的底部是連通的)。虹吸管是通到外部的。水會持續上升到內部的開口端。
可以參考以下的影片


簡易鐘型潮汐開關
1.由於水持續進入水箱,水在水箱和潮汐開關內以同樣的速度上升。(潮汐開關內的底部是連通的)。虹吸管是通到外部的。水會持續上升到內部的開口端。 2.一旦水位上升到內部的開口端,直接…